| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Circumstantial Evidence
170
   |
Posted - 2015.03.02 23:32:40 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Rise was extremely accommodating during the redesign of the Tech 1 haulers, listening to the feedback that simply changing existing stats around was not interesting gameplay, and we got a newly diverse set of T1 haulers, as a result.
CCP Rise was at first reluctant, but did adopt suggestions that the Bowhead get an HP buff and agility bonus, compared to the original proposal.
The initial proposal to add capital rigs to freighters was met with tons of feedback, and the whole concept changed to giving them much more affordable low slot modules. (A side effect of nerfs to base stats, so that adding low slot modules wouldn't buff them over what they could do before - resulted in several players observing "be careful what you wish for.") I don't want to start a freighter complaint thread - this is just another example of feedback affecting the outcome. |
Circumstantial Evidence
171
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:58:32 -
[2] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:...various opinions Nobody gets everything they want. The point of my message was to show specific examples where player feedback *has* influenced the outcome. |
Circumstantial Evidence
172
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 20:28:08 -
[3] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:Circumstantial Evidence wrote:The point of my message was to show specific examples where player feedback *has* influenced the outcome. And your point was taken. Maybe you should re-read my original post where I said words like "sometimes" and "tend". Just because examples exist where he does, does not mean that examples don't exist where he doesn't. I made my response listing three cases, intending to provide some balance. Your reply was dismissive in detail, of each case of developer changes in response to feedback I cited. Thus, it looked like your dissatisfaction at not seeing your personal views and other feedback addressed, was dodging the larger point. You saw it, and in fact I saw "tend" in your original statement, nonetheless a general negativity prompted my post. Thank you for clarifying. |
| |
|